From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 10:53:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FBB16A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:53:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from clanbuckbuck.org (c-24-17-98-189.client.comcast.net [24.17.98.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38C5443D2F for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:53:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ryallsd@datasphereweb.com) Received: (qmail 15396 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 18:53:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO RYALLS1) (131.107.3.86) by c-24-17-98-189.client.comcast.net with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 18:53:41 -0000 From: "Derrick Ryalls" To: "'Forrest Aldrich'" , Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:53:40 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 In-Reply-To: <4043802F.4030301@forrie.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: FreeBSD filesystem performance in Enterprise X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 18:53:43 -0000 > Curious how FreeBSD ffs performs in Enterprise-level=20 > environments (ie:=20 > email stores that send 100's of thousands of messages per =20 > day) versus=20 > other filesystems like XFS (I heard thre's a port going on for=20 > FreeBSD..?), ReiserFS, et al. Is there a FAQ that covers=20 > some of this=20 > and the various tuning issues one might consider (filesystem and=20 > kernel). This applies either disk-alone or across a raid array,=20 > etc. I'm interested in hearing others experiences (good and bad). >=20 >=20 You are almost starting a holy war :) I believe hotmail used to be hosted on FreeBSD until it was bought out = by MS, that should be a decent volume indicator. I run a very small email list server and it works fine on a p200. I did = see a noticable jump in speed when I switched the mail service from sendmail = to qmail, so it is also dependant on what you will run.