From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 13 11:18:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42588A6A for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:18:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EBA8FC14 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qADBI9Ej004574 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:18:09 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qADBI8eT004573 for arch@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:18:08 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:18:06 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Increasing MAXLOGNAME from 17 to 33 Message-ID: <20121113111806.GE62533@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r7U+bLA8boMOj+mD" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:18:09 -0000 --r7U+bLA8boMOj+mD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I want to increase MAXLOGNAME in sys/param.h from 17 to 33 to allow 32-character long usernames, the PR: misc/161091 and misc/133926 already requested for it. utmpx already allow 32 character long user names. I plan to bump the __FreeBSD_version at the same time because of the ABI breakage. This is simplify life of lots administrator, this value, is a common value for other operating systems. Do anyone have objections about it? regards, Bapt --r7U+bLA8boMOj+mD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlCiLG4ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExxzQCgv0OCrlGB3COs6rC0PjLigdct aMoAnRY27RFx17Jxmz5KnL1mKBqxC/3p =ZG8F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r7U+bLA8boMOj+mD--