From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 01:49:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17E84FF for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 01:49:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2F932680 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 01:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jre-mbp.elischer.org (ppp121-45-235-45.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.235.45]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r981nXWI034876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:49:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <525364A8.6020300@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:49:28 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Kargl Subject: Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base References: <20131007150658.GA79233@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <52534B5E.7010401@freebsd.org> <20131008002854.GB56872@funkthat.com> <525354C2.8070807@m5p.com> <20131008013350.GB31261@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20131008013350.GB31261@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: George Mitchell , freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 01:49:38 -0000 On 10/8/13 9:33 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:41:38PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote: >> On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark Gurney wrote: >>> Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800: >>>> not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc >>>> becasue it is "just there" >>> +1 >>> >> Folks, this is just plain a major violation of the Principle of Least >> Amazement. RCS is ideal for keeping track of my configuration files >> in /etc. What do we gain by removing it? > Less GPL code in FreeBSD? not a problem unless you plan in shipping a changed version of it on your product??