From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 05:49:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E3D16A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:49:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pastinakel.tue.nl (pastinakel.tue.nl [131.155.2.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1033943D2D for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:49:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: by pastinakel.tue.nl (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4100114BF80; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:49:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by pastinakel.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B822914BDFE; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:49:50 +0100 (CET) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0A5notv027752; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:49:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stijn) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:49:50 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20050110054950.GB8531@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Stijn Hoop , Ted Mittelstaedt , tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net, "Colin J. Raven" , Peter Risdon , FreeBSD Questions References: <41E16C3A.6040300@taborandtashell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on pastinakel.tue.nl X-Spam-DCC: CollegeOfNewCaledonia: pastinakel.tue.nl 1189; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Level: cc: "Colin J. Raven" cc: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net cc: Peter Risdon cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: CA-cert X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:49:56 -0000 --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Offtopic, but... On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 09:22:48PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > Pointless for us, as CAcert's root certificate isn't included in > > > I.E., so the end users have to go through the same honky-tonk to > > > include it in their browsers as if you just make your own certs. > > > > Not quite. If they include the CA-Cert root certificate, they only have > > to do that once for all of your CA-Cert signed certificates. >=20 > Good point. Not only that, but the more people using CA-Cert, the easier it will become to convince browsers to include the CA-Cert root certificate by default. --Stijn --=20 Tact, n.: The unsaid part of what you're thinking. --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB4hd+Y3r/tLQmfWcRAiYJAKCqfT72/tEbnyKGzm6BdpHG7Gpt+gCgjpn0 qFAGVv5gjuQ/FVCpTmkvW4o= =tWd3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--