Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 04:50:02 -0800 (PST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/35201: link and unlink are not SUSv2-compliant as the manpage states Message-ID: <200202221250.g1MCo2a62512@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/35201; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Tim Robbins <tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au> Cc: <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: bin/35201: link and unlink are not SUSv2-compliant as the manpage states Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 23:40:19 +1100 (EST) On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Tim Robbins wrote: > >Description: > The manual pages for link and unlink, which are 'part of' ln and rm, > and share the same manual pages, claim that these utilities are SUSV2 > compliant. This is not the case. > > >From The Single UNIX Specification, Version 2, XBD, Utility Argument Syntax: > Guideline 10: > "The argument -- should be accepted as a delimiter indicating the end of > options. Any following arguments should be treated as operands, even if they Can you quote POSIX.1-2001? It is more authoritative, and almost as easy to find. > ... > link and unlink, therefore, should accept the "--" delimiter. The fix for this part should use getopt(3) instead of yet more home made arg parsing. getopt(3) gives special semantics "--" automagically. I think they are the same as specified in the guidelines. Otherwise, many other utilities would have this bug. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202221250.g1MCo2a62512>