Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 00:33:52 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> Cc: Karim Fodil-Lemelin <fodillemlinkarim@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, gibbs@freebsd.org, scottl@freebsd.org, mjacob@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301200033080.7875@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <50FABB71.6050406@freebsd.org> References: <CAA3ZYrBV9f%2BcHx4jvS0UKTr%2Bp7eNUBA0S2%2Bv9oZAHqwm9VBOWw@mail.gmail.com> <6C0B86E6-195C-4D35-AE40-3D2F9F6D28FB@yahoo.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301182217590.1478@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1358544287.32417.251.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <50F9CFEB.5060302@feral.com> <50F9DB9A.9050303@gmail.com> <50FABB71.6050406@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> to be enabled to get any speed-up from tagged commands. This was no > risk with SCSI drives, since the cache did not make the drives lye i see no correlation between interface type and possibility of lying about command completion.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1301200033080.7875>