Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:44:12 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/procmail Makefile Message-ID: <4E5D216C.6070801@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838VNcjKLTTW2-420fs9cnP865WRXinqBTtP4sgu2Mttrg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201108300823.p7U8NIfD038098@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E5CC44C.3070604@FreeBSD.org> <20110830111152.GF28186@home.opsec.eu> <4E5CD28A.1080809@FreeBSD.org> <20110830122726.GG28186@home.opsec.eu> <4E5D0856.8080505@FreeBSD.org> <20110830163933.GC17573@lonesome.com> <CADLo838VNcjKLTTW2-420fs9cnP865WRXinqBTtP4sgu2Mttrg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 30.08.2011 19:29, schrieb Chris Rees: > On 30 August 2011 17:39, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:57:10PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: >>> How about if we added a new tag "OBSOLESCENT" or so that permits >>> building the software only if it's already installed but refuses new >>> installations? >> >> Right now if you set DEPRECATED you'll get a warning. Shouldn't >> that be sufficient without introducing a new mechanism that enforces >> a policy? > > +1 > > I agree-- isn't that what DEPRECATED is for?? It only warns, it does not prevent fresh installs on systems that don't have the same port/package already installed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5D216C.6070801>