From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 30 16:31:09 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4CF1B16A4CE; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:31:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0C1C443D46; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:31:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id 16BAD5309; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:31:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id BB3F35308; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:31:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id 93AE133CAA; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:31:02 +0200 (CEST)
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403301635390.43902-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:31:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403301635390.43902-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
	(Julian
	Elischer's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:36:27 -0800 (PST)")
Message-ID: <xzp1xn9q2m1.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63
cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: performance of jailed processes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:31:09 -0000

Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> writes:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> > Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > If you plug 'YOUR_IP' with variations, does it change things?
> > Aha!  using the primary IP address works fine, but using one of the
> > jail IPs does not.
> ANY of them?
> try the first added and the last added. do they have different delays?

No noticeable difference.  I get more variation from one run to
another (about 10%) then I get from changing the IP address.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no