Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:46:19 +0100 From: Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org> To: apache@FreeBSD.org Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: patch for bsd.apache.mk is ready for review ... Message-ID: <4D88FC8B.90207@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4D8805A8.3090502@p6m7g8.com> References: <4D87E58C.9030804@gmx.de> <4D8805A8.3090502@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2011-03-22 03:12, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 3/21/2011 7:55 PM, olli hauer wrote: >> Hi Philip, >> >> a new patch for bsd.apache.mk is ready for review. >> >> I've done some tests in tinderbox and it looks good, >> but maybe you find something I've overlooked. >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/Mk/PR_147009_ports__Mk__bsd.apache.mk_2011-03-22_01.diff > > Looks fine to me. > Hi Philip, a first local exp-run was nearly 100% success. A hand full ports which need some fixing, special if they are in master slave combination and have both times USE_APACHE?=/= ab+ defined. For example www/mod_jk (1.3+) and www/mod_jk-ap2 (2.0+) Both times the preferred apache (2.2) was chosen now, but this is easy to fix. Do you already have an apache 2.3/2.4 port for testing available? I suspect there are some candidates which have defined USE_APACHE?=/= ab+ which cannot be build with 2.3/2.4. I will then run the next local exp-run to identify these ports. -- Regards, olli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D88FC8B.90207>