Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:23:46 -0400 From: "T." <freebsd-questions@lists.goldenpath.org> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SYSCALL_MODULE macro modified? Message-ID: <49B7E592.8040806@lists.goldenpath.org> In-Reply-To: <49B70F38.9010305@lists.goldenpath.org> References: <49B70F38.9010305@lists.goldenpath.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
T. wrote:
> Found 7.0's sysent.h file modified at the commonly used SYSCALL_MODULE
> macro,
> wasn't sure how I should modify my code to accommodate the change so
> changed the sysent.h (yikes!).
> No biggy right? Removed the AUE_NULL. That's all that's been added.
> But the argument was NULL, so what the hell else could I do? AUE_NULL
> didn't work.
> And how can you be requiring anything else where once there was NULL.
> And when I said NULL, I meant NULL! Boggling! This is related to some
> audit stuff?
> Anyway...
>
> #define SYSCALL_MODULE(name, offset, new_sysent, evh, arg) \
> static struct syscall_module_data name##_syscall_mod = { \
> evh, arg, offset, new_sysent, { 0, NULL, AUE_NULL } \
> }; \
> \
> static moduledata_t name##_mod = { \
> #name, \
> syscall_module_handler, \
> &name##_syscall_mod \
> }; \
> DECLARE_MODULE(name, name##_mod, SI_SUB_SYSCALLS, SI_ORDER_MIDDLE)
> _______________________________________________
So, if anyone else is interested / doesn't already know, if you
encounter AUE_NULL errors compiling
rather than go and removing AUE_NULL from the system source (which works
too), you can just add
#include <bsm/audit_kevents.h>
That's where AUE_NULL is defined.
You'd think they would have included that in the macro then, eh?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49B7E592.8040806>