Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:17:30 -0800
From:      Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com>
To:        Alan Cox <alc@rice.edu>
Cc:        "xen@freebsd.org" <xen@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PV i386 patch
Message-ID:  <1324412250.12783.9.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EF0EB8D.2020703@rice.edu>
References:  <4EEB9CCE.6090701@rice.edu> <1324169806.3093.3.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EED4982.3080208@freebsd.org> <1324339762.3093.14.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EF04F3C.9010309@rice.edu> <1324387685.3093.28.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EF0D8D7.2060503@rice.edu> <1324411057.12783.8.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EF0EB8D.2020703@rice.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 12:09 -0800, Alan Cox wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 13:57, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 10:49 -0800, Alan Cox wrote:
> >> On 12/20/2011 07:28, Sean Bruno wrote:
> >>>> The code that panics shouldn't even exist in the Xen pmap.  Try the
> >>>> attached patch.
> >>>>
> >>>> Alan
> >>>>
> >>> Indeed .... how on earth did we ever use this stuff?  :-)
> >>>
> >>> Tested to 2G on ref9-xen32.f.o .... should I go any higher?
> >> Sure.  Right now, I don't know of any reason that it should crash with
> >> more memory.  :-)
> >>
> >> Do either of you know if there is a PR in gnats for this 768 MB
> >> limitation bug that I should mention in the commit log?
> >>
> >> Alan
> >>
> >
> > No, I just checked and I didn't put a PR in ... lame.
> >
> > I think I discussed it with colin or kip, but I don't remember if we
> > ever figured out anything else.
> >
> 
> Ok.  I'll commit the patch shortly.  (Note that what I'll commit will 
> remove another bit of unnecessary code.)
> 
> Alan
> 


I suspect that this earns you +1 beer at bsdcan this year.

Sean




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1324412250.12783.9.camel>