Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 11:52:21 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPX now available Message-ID: <199510131852.LAA18011@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1358.813576972@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Oct 13, 95 10:36:12 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Could I raise an issue here ? > > I don't think we should add any IPX stuff in libc. > It doesn't belong there based on a projectede frequency of use. > > Can we agree on libipx.a ? > > Yes, before you ask: I would really prefer a libtcpip.a too, but I also > realize it's not practical. I suggest the use of dlopen in the address family manipulation routines to dynamically cause library support to exist on a per family basis. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510131852.LAA18011>