From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 30 16:48:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1471316A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:48:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 212.106.252.179.adsl.jazztel.es (212.106.252.179.adsl.jazztel.es [212.106.252.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070EF43D49 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:48:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from [192.168.254.16] (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) iBUGmIP2000597; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:48:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@redesjm.local) Message-ID: <41D43153.5030608@redesjm.local> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:48:19 +0100 From: Jose M Rodriguez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041227) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KATO Tsuguru References: <20041229222343.GA71433@dragon.nuxi.com> <41D3BA59.9060505@redesjm.local> <20041230212629.3d8291e1.tkato432@yahoo.com> <41D3F64A.4000608@redesjm.local> <20041230224717.369884e6.tkato432@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041230224717.369884e6.tkato432@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.29.0.5; VDF: 6.29.0.31; host: antares.redesjm.local) cc: Jose M Rodriguez cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why do we have both ghostscript-gpl and ghostscript-gnu? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:48:24 -0000 KATO Tsuguru wrote: >On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:36:26 +0100 >Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > > >>My plans are make the cups device with any gs you chose, and limit the >>cups-pstoraster port only to de cups config/scripts. >> >> > >Similar attempt was once proposed and then declined. > >There are many people who dislike huge cups-base package >to be added to default dependency of ghostscript package. >On the other hand, it's sorrowful if every CUPS user must >rebuild ghostscript from ports tree. > > > This is not necessary. You only needs cups/esp-gs sources for build. Right now, cups-pstoraster install a gnu-gs with cups device, without runtime and name changed. It's far better add the cups device (not the pstoraster scripts/config) to gs (any). so, gs will build-depend on cups-src (I prefer this over esp-gs) if you select the cups device (OPTION). and cups-pstoraster will run-depend on gs(you choose) and cups-base. -- josemi