From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 05:56:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7182116A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 05:56:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354D443D5A for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 05:56:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru) Received: from msd.mbrd.ru ([194.117.71.30] helo=[172.16.4.9]) by mail.ciam.ru with asmtp (Exim 4.x) id 1BcHnG-000BrO-1V; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:56:34 +0400 Message-ID: <40D6788F.8010902@ciam.ru> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:56:31 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Eikemeier References: <7B355F0F-C2CA-11D8-9250-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <7B355F0F-C2CA-11D8-9250-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: okay to .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.java.mk"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 05:56:43 -0000 Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > I have a different approach in PR 64233: pre-include options when > available. A bsd.port.options.mk would just be a hack working around > the many deficiencies of OPTIONS. IMHO OPTIONS should be deprecated > and replaced by something better. I would like to see a graphical > configuration tool, but OPTIONS is just badly designed and hard to > support, so it causes more problems than it solves. Does it means your PR/64233 is not appropriate? --- Sem.