From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 18 16:34:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE2710656B2; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:34:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:198:206::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2628FC41; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (localhost.spoerlein.net [IPv6:::1]) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBIGY0Ld026862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:34:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) Received: (from uqs@localhost) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBIGY0KB026861; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:34:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:34:00 +0100 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20091218163400.GQ55913@acme.spoerlein.net> Mail-Followup-To: Anton Shterenlikht , Roman Divacky , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20091216144906.GA23342@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091216145033.GA69013@freebsd.org> <20091216151847.GA34025@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091216151847.GA34025@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Roman Divacky , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: llvm on ia64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:34:05 -0000 On Wed, 16.12.2009 at 15:18:47 +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 03:50:33PM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote: > > I wont comment the failure but llvm does NOT support generating IA64 > > code as the support for this was removed some 6 months or so ago.... > > > > what exactly do you want to use the llvm@ia64 for? > > replacement for gcc.. > > gcc44 and 45 fail to build on ia64. From what I can gather (I'm a > user, not a developer) after following this for some months on gcc bugzilla, > gcc folks do not really have a solution, or might not even understand > the problem. Lots of ports of interest to me are dependent on gcc44, > e.g. gfortran, blas, lapack, calculix, code_aster, etc. So I'm looking > for a possible replacement for gcc44 on ia64 Have you tried with a recent gcc45 port? It now depends on newer binutils, which is required to build it with -march=native on amd64, perhaps you're hitting the same base-binutils-is-too-freaking-old issue? hth, Uli