From owner-freebsd-current Tue Sep 1 21:01:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA28105 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 1 Sep 1998 21:01:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA28097 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 1998 21:01:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA01407; Tue, 1 Sep 1998 21:58:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id VAA16398; Tue, 1 Sep 1998 21:58:32 -0600 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 21:58:32 -0600 Message-Id: <199809020358.VAA16398@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Dawes Cc: Mike Smith , Terry Lambert , John Birrell , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Standardizing a BSD/ELF ABI... In-Reply-To: <19980902131453.C21469@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> References: <199809020111.SAA11738@usr01.primenet.com> <199809011842.SAA02674@dingo.cdrom.com> <19980902131453.C21469@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >> Is FreeBSD ELF binary compatible with NetBSD/OpenBSD/BSDI ELF? ... > >You will have to convince the NetBSD people to stop randomly changing > >their system calls first. ... > Is there compatibility for dynamically linked executables when using the > runtime host platform's native libraries? For the native libraries, but not for system calls, which are run in the kernel and not in the libraries. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message