From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 5 13:17:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D918637B426; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BC843F93; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:17:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from pooh.honeypot.net.strauser.com (kirk@pooh.honeypot.net [10.0.5.128]) by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h55KH8DY084318; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:17:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) To: Sergey Matveychuk References: <3EDE03E3.8090102@ciam.ru> From: Kirk Strauser Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:17:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3EDE03E3.8090102@ciam.ru> (Sergey Matveychuk's message of "Wed, 04 Jun 2003 18:36:19 +0400") Message-ID: <87y90gqny6.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> Lines: 27 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 20:17:21 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-06-04T14:36:19Z, Sergey Matveychuk writes: > I'v fixed patch-aa, added depends on shell/bash2, fixed pkg-message > and tested. Regarding the corrupted archive: Thanks for fixing that. It worked correctly on my system before using the "shar" command to create the archive, but I don't know enough about that command to get it to do the right thing. Regarding the shells/bash2 dependency: Should it be dependent on bash2? While I agree that it's mostly useless without bash2, isn't there a possibility that it could be regarded as documentation, or used with a Linux bash from one of the linux_base installations? Regarding the pkg-message: I tried to copy-and-paste from the pkg-message files from other ports that were apparently done incorrectly. Thanks for putting me on the right track. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+36VE5sRg+Y0CpvERAsVIAKCePyqm6LNvxU5UHSLjUahrOq9myQCgj+vK Z09XPytyRGYGs7UYFU4gc1o= =w0dW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--