From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan  8 10:51:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB9616A4CE
	for <sparc64@freebsd.org>; Thu,  8 Jan 2004 10:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from radix.sorted.org (radix.sorted.org [194.70.217.146])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB27743D1F
	for <sparc64@freebsd.org>; Thu,  8 Jan 2004 10:51:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from pete@sorted.org)
Received: by radix.sorted.org (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id C37942B926; Thu,  8 Jan 2004 18:51:25 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:51:25 +0000
From: Pete Bentley <pete@sorted.org>
To: sparc64@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040108185125.GA92398@sorted.org>
References: <20040108094116.GU2060@elvis.mu.org>
	<20040108175835.A95298@newtrinity.zeist.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040108175835.A95298@newtrinity.zeist.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Re: Need testers for patch to get MAC address of integrated dc(4)
	cards
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 18:51:29 -0000

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:58:35PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> The patch is compile tested but otherwise not (yet) tested on my side.
> I probably won't be able to really test it in time for getting it into
> 5.2-RELEASE, so if you own a Netra X1 or a Sunfire V100 please give it
> a try an reply with all the dcX lines you get in /var/run/dmesg.boot.

After minimal testing, it appears to be functionally identical to
the previous patch I was using (the one that called 
OF_getprop( ..., "local-mac-address") from inside if_dc.c).

This on a X1 with -CURRENT as of about 2 hours ago with just this
patch applied:-

dc0: <Davicom DM9102A 10/100BaseTX> port 0x10000-0x100ff at device 12.0 on pci0
dc0: Ethernet address: 00:03:ba:06:2a:a6
dc1: <Davicom DM9102A 10/100BaseTX> port 0x10100-0x101ff mem 0x2000-0x20ff at device 5.0 on pci0
dc1: Ethernet address: 00:03:ba:06:2a:a7
[...]
dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state
dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state
dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state
dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state


Surely we can do better than OF_getetheraddr2() as a name though :)

Pete.