From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Oct 3 14:50:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from wopr.caltech.edu (wopr.caltech.edu [131.215.240.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD152150C9 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 1999 14:50:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mph@wopr.caltech.edu) Received: (from mph@localhost) by wopr.caltech.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA62030; Sun, 3 Oct 1999 14:50:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mph) Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 14:50:51 -0700 From: Matthew Hunt To: Will Andrews Cc: Jim Mock , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: epic4 Message-ID: <19991003145051.A56377@wopr.caltech.edu> References: <19991003141519.A734@blues.ghis.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Will Andrews on Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:01:14AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:01:14AM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: > Is there really any reason to keep two different versions of EPIC anymore? > I always use EPIC4 rather than the ircii-epic port (which is > ircii2.8.2-EPIC3.004, which seems rather obsolete now). I am the maintainer of the old EPIC port. I also use EPIC4 now. I will remove the old port in a day or two, unless somebody volunteers a good reason not to. -- Matthew Hunt * Inertia is a property http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ * of matter. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message