From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 20 23:30:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mcferrin.cs.colostate.edu (mcferrin.CS.ColoState.EDU [129.82.45.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E9237B7B1 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 23:30:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kunze@CS.ColoState.EDU) Received: from localhost (kunze@localhost) by mcferrin.cs.colostate.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA12198; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 00:30:04 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 00:30:04 -0700 (MST) From: "Small, but frustrating." To: Bart van Leeuwen Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Looking for a good FreeBSD HTML Editor In-Reply-To: <38D73EE1.92CD5B95@ixori.demon.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG vim has the nicest syntax highlighting for html i have ever seen. it's not WYSIWYG but is the closest you could ever get with a text-based editor. text in bold tags is bold, links are underlined and blue, altogether it's done very well. [this space irrationally left blank] matt kunze On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Bart van Leeuwen wrote: > Matt Rohrer wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have used bluefish, its pretty good, but for most of my work I just > > > use the Advanced Editor in KDE, it's similar to the regular editor but > > > does color coding. > > > Chip W > > > www.wiegand.org > > > > Neither is WYSIWYG, though. I'm not aware of any WYSIWYG editors for > > FreeBSD (or any other UNIX, for that matter). > > > > well.. netscape composer is kinda wysiwyg... but I dono if it qualifies > as a good authoring tool.. It does produce reasonably readable html tho. > > -- > Bart. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message