From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 10:32:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3E716A4CF for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:32:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from iota.root-servers.ch (iota.root-servers.ch [193.41.193.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60A7043D13 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:32:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch) Received: (qmail 36458 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2003 18:32:39 -0000 Received: from dclient217-162-134-28.hispeed.ch (HELO ga) (217.162.134.28) by 0 with SMTP; 9 Dec 2003 18:32:39 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:33:43 +0100 From: Gabriel Ambuehl Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1478416187.20031209193343@buz.ch> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <006a01c3be80$27f22da0$0200a8c0@veggy.org> References: <005301c3be64$cb8369a0$0200a8c0@veggy.org> <006a01c3be80$27f22da0$0200a8c0@veggy.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: How's linux-ibm-jdk14 in the memory footprint department? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 18:32:44 -0000 Hello Nicolas, Tuesday, December 9, 2003, 7:12:55 PM, you wrote: > What I'd like to know is whether IBM's implementation of the JVM > happens to use a little less memory. I think 203 MB is too much for > a console application, and that box only has 64 MB of RAM. I did > install linux-ibm-jdk14 to check this myself, but found out it > requires the USER_LDT setting in the kernel, and I can't reboot > because of a stupid setting since I'm running important services on > the box. > Any linux-ibm-jdk14 fans out there? Well I had installed it the last time when I built the native JDK. I agree that 203MB is too much for a normal console app but I'd say forget about using Java on machines with less than 256 or more likely even 512MB memory (personally, I develop on a 1GB machine RAM these days but that's W2K eating resources, too) Best regards, Gabriel