Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 08:50:53 -0800 From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: style(9) question Message-ID: <4407226D.3050901@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060302163633.H77029@fledge.watson.org> References: <20060302105229.P83093@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060302163633.H77029@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote: > I can't really think of a good reason > for return (foo) over return foo I'm not sure if this qualifies as a *good* reason, but writing "return (foo)" is more consistent with other keyword usage: "if (foo)", "for (foo)", "while (foo)", "switch (foo)". Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4407226D.3050901>