Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 04 Jun 1996 14:06:26 -0700
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
To:        "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@HeadCandy.com>
Cc:        freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Unix/NT synchronization model (was: SMP progress?) 
Message-ID:  <1368.833922386@critter.tfs.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Jun 1996 13:55:43 PDT." <199606042055.NAA23549@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> >> At the risk of asking a st00pid FAQ question, what is the current
> >> state of progress on FreeBSD SMP work?
> 
> >Pretty good, quite stable.
> 
> So, where are SMP development issues discussed?  I didn't see a lot of
> traffic in this group in the archives.
in smp@freebsd.org, there isn't much traffic :-)

> Another question I have: What is the "reference" model for SMP
> synchronization methods in Unix?  Solaris?  OSF/1?  For those who are
> familiar with the Windows NT synchronization model, how does this Unix
> reference model compare?  I. e. what are the similarties and
> differences?
To Be Decided really...

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1368.833922386>