From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 10 03:58:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B534016A4DC
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 03:58:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub1.midco.net (mailhub1.midco.net [24.220.0.32])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DC843D39
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 03:58:44 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from pmes@bis.midco.net)
Received: (qmail 31601 invoked by uid 0); 10 Feb 2004 11:58:44 -0000
Received: from host-195-219-220-24.midco.net (HELO bis.midco.net)
	([24.220.219.195])          (envelope-sender <pmes@bis.midco.net>)
	by lvs-pop.midco.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <conrads@cox.net>; 10 Feb 2004 11:58:44 -0000
Message-ID: <4028C772.5070600@bis.midco.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 05:58:42 -0600
From: Peter Schultz <pmes@bis.midco.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040209
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: conrads@cox.net
References: <XFMail.20040209061237.conrads@cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20040209061237.conrads@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Results using ULE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:58:44 -0000

Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> One thing that really stands out is the peculiar behavior of top.  Several
> seconds may go by where all processes are showing zero CPU usage, then suddenly
> one of them "comes alive" again.  It's weird.
> 

A nice feature for top would be to have it measure using samples per 
second, so that I don't have to keep hammering on my spacebar.  :-)

Pete...