From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 9 12:17:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6F237B401 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 12:17:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) id f59JH9c08727; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 12:17:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 12:17:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200106091917.f59JH9c08727@earth.backplane.com> To: Ian Dowse Cc: tlambert2@mindspring.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UFS large directory performance References: <200106081115.aa43142@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :leaving the dirhash structure attached to the inode when its hash :array is freed. : :An updated patch is available at : : http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~iedowse/FreeBSD/dirhash.diff3 : :I haven't had a chance to do more than a minimal amount of testing, :so there may be many issues remaining. : :Ian I'll have a chance to do some testing tonight now that I have the swap-full fixes rolling down the hill. The two-level approach looks a lot cleaner - we should be able to solve whatever performance/load/scaleability issues arise with it. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message