From owner-freebsd-arch  Sat Oct  2  5: 8:34 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FF414F8D
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Oct 1999 05:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA00234
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 14:08:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA92386
	for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 14:08:24 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B64A14F8D
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  2 Oct 1999 05:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@d60-025.leach.ucdavis.edu [169.237.60.25])
	by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA63222;
	Sat, 2 Oct 1999 05:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id FAA86511;
	Sat, 2 Oct 1999 05:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien)
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 05:08:12 -0700
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>
To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Now that sigcontext is gone ...
Message-ID: <19991002050811.G7256@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com
References: <19990930162834.C20978@nonpc.cs.rice.edu> <XFMail.990930144341.jdp@polstra.com> <19991002011955.A85828@dragon.nuxi.com> <37F5D9FB.D121CF79@newsguy.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i
In-Reply-To: <37F5D9FB.D121CF79@newsguy.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> [redirecting to -arch as a test-case]

Yes, lets.

On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 07:10:03PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, this even violates the 1996 POSIX spec.
> 
> I like having the distinction this provides, but since this is stricly
> freebsd-i386,

I really don't think the "distinction" is worth it if we are out of POSIX
spec, and in left-field from other Unixes.

-- 
-- David    (obrien@NUXI.com)




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message