From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Oct 16 18:56:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61522E420B8 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 18:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.shmhost.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:51d7::103:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27B9468485; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 18:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:25:233:95c8:93e7:5fdd:3562] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:25:233:95c8:93e7:5fdd:3562]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E23E160E60; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:56:05 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: cve-2017-13077 - WPA2 security vulni From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: <20171016185014.94859750@spqr.komquats.com> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:56:03 +0200 Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Kevin Oberman , Adrian Chadd , Lev Serebryakov , blubee blubeeme , Poul-Henning Kamp , FreeBSD current Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4CF70CE3-AC4B-4AFE-BF14-C78C5310F2EB@lastsummer.de> References: <20171016185014.94859750@spqr.komquats.com> To: Cy Schubert X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Spam-Status: No score=-1.0 tagged_above=10.0 required=10.0 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 18:56:11 -0000 > On 16. Oct 2017, at 8:50 PM, Cy Schubert = wrote: >=20 > Eight patches have been posted so, it should be easy to patch 2.5, = MFC, and bring head up to 2.6 later. This should avoid the risk of = possible regressions. Nope, does not apply easily. Refactoring changed contexts, function = names and variable usage logic between 2.5 and 2.6. Cheers, Franco=