From owner-freebsd-hardware  Thu Jun 26 17:24:55 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA22284
          for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 17:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA22276
          for <freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 17:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA28616; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 17:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jon Inouye <jinouye@cse.ogi.edu>
cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: IRQ assignment for PII motherboards 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 26 Jun 1997 17:12:45 PDT."
             <Pine.HPP.3.95.970626170217.4996F-100000@indurain.cse.ogi.edu> 
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 17:25:18 -0700
Message-ID: <28612.867371118@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> However, sharing an IRQ between an Intel EtherExpress 10/100 and an
> Adaptec 3940W is _not_ performance friendly - I expect timeout errors for
> FreeBSD and see them occasionally on WindowsNT.  You would think that

Really?  I wouldn't expect it and will be curious to see what your
actual results are.  Sorry, I mis-inferred from your previous message
that you were already running FreeBSD and were having problems, not
that you hadn't even tried it yet.  Please, go try it and then come
back and tell us what happens. :)

					Jordan