From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 19 19:15:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A678F61C for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-x22b.google.com (mail-vb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64DDD1F55 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id p6so897743vbe.16 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:15:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=W1gdOnqEW7eicPVwDn6J4vs1hsn7Q6mKcZoZz6NtfvQ=; b=P7JvHG4NMW1oDXY5Q45vGUCBJmvNOwWYiF84DQk5pVpiOJtHF4POplNh9+H9m/mtHj /Z0ssXZPN3jrq58bN9h4/s5XAuk1PzJeVU4Q+9EglAr8E2Z0KbOSHrMZd9BLzbwD8V1N 4hog1MWa26Iaf+g35zZCfJfGrhxDgIoB30ycbbfmFDvBdCMcg45Lj34MeIme19p+DRcx lRKp5hQucj/tUo4eg0CiUIPuDMPq2fFLNIm4nE5P3DuyB7TN8XFCQDk7QG2m55TSGAWW EpjeIRONWbi1p6Za/E3hxLzm7b/QCIUVZZaGShapVsfuoHoOHU1tYTBRHRIGDP5GvGG3 GBqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.186.202 with SMTP id ct10mr2092377vcb.14.1387480519138; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:15:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.221.37.66 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:15:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52B343FE.4070808@FreeBSD.org> References: <52B0D149.5020308@marino.st> <52B343FE.4070808@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:15:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: If ports@ list continues to be used as substitute for GNATS, I'm unsubscribing From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:15:20 -0000 On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > I sincerely disagree and think it's quite rude to users to not accept > their reports however they send them to us. current@ constantly has > build failures on it, even automated. There's no reason ports@ shouldn't > either. It tells everyone that "yes" there is a problem with this port > and "it's not just me". > We should accept reports from users - ack. However, there is nothing wrong with educating people about what, how and why when it comes to problems reports. If you accept anything, you will only end up with useless garbage. HTH -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen