From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 19 11:24:28 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id CF5651065688; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:24:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:24:28 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20080319112428.GB76554@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200803180100.m2I10QTD070047@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20080318193855.0439b197.stas@FreeBSD.org>
	<20080318181546.GA10903@FreeBSD.org>
	<1205917353.76695.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
	<20080319091859.GA56200@FreeBSD.org>
	<1205921932.76695.14.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
	<20080319133817.3bfe893f.stas@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080319133817.3bfe893f.stas@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, pav@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/java/eclipseme Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:24:29 -0000

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:38:17PM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:18:52 +0100
> Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> mentioned:
> > 
> > Still, the mkdir call may fall, and then the failure is less obvious to
> > the user/porter.
> >
> 
> On the other hand, the porter can always modify the call temporarly to see
> where the problem resides.
>  
> > 
> > Oh no more policies, please!
> > 
> 
> Hmm, am I only one who thinks that we have too few policies for ports? I'd
> like to see, at least, official policies for PREFIX-cleaness, CFLAGS
> and file permissions (that is don't copy files using CP) honoring.

No, you're definitely not!  I have a lot of things to tell about this.
You just named a few.

./danfe