From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 22 13:39:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5CC16A4CE for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:39:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.oav.net (mail01.oav.net [193.218.105.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5186243D53 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:39:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiwi@oav.net) Received: from localhost (mail01.oav.net [193.218.105.18]) by mail02.oav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C694022821; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:39:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kiwi@oav.net) Received: from mail02.oav.net ([193.218.105.18]) by localhost (mail02.oav.net [172.31.2.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 95245-09-6; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:39:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.1.254] (babel.zehc.net [213.36.100.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail02.oav.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5772A22820; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:39:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kiwi@oav.net) In-Reply-To: <20041022130324.GF92618@qube.teaser.fr> References: <72BED2C2-2429-11D9-B165-000A958871B8@oav.net> <20041022130324.GF92618@qube.teaser.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Xavier Beaudouin Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:39:29 +0200 To: Stephane Clodic X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail01.oav.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.095 tagged_above=-999 required=6.3 tests=AWL, SMILEY X-Spam-Level: cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netra T1 105 hme0 woes ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:39:35 -0000 Hi :) > As far I remember, T1 105 has 2 ethernet ports on the back (+ LOM) Exactly :) > About hme autoneg trouble, does your switch in autoneg too or forced to > something like 100baseTX full-duplex ? The switch (cisco catalyst 3548-xl) is forced into 100BaseTX full-duplex. I get same problem when I set it to autoneg too... /Xavier -- Xavier Beaudouin - Unix System Administrator & Projects Leader. President of Kazar Organization : http://www.kazar.net/ Please visit http://caudium.net/, home of Caudium & Camas projects