From owner-cvs-all Wed Dec 29 17:10:18 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from m0.cs.berkeley.edu (m0.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.176]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAF2156B1; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 17:10:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca41-199.ix.netcom.com [209.111.208.199]) by m0.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA54508; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 17:09:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id RAA64510; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 17:08:17 -0800 (PST) To: Thomas Gellekum Cc: Sheldon Hearn , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/pdksh Makefile References: <15989.946465280@axl.noc.iafrica.com> From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 29 Dec 1999 17:08:00 -0800 In-Reply-To: Thomas Gellekum's message of "29 Dec 1999 12:13:43 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk * From: Thomas Gellekum * > Um, wouldn't this be better done as a pkg/INSTALL script so that it * > works for the package as well? * * Doesn't the @exec in pkg/PLIST work for you? I think either way is fine, but one added benefit with using pkg/INSTALL is that you can call that from post-install and thus don't have to write the same command twice. Of course, for something as simple as this, it doesn't really matter.... Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message