From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Mar 26 11:41:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA14845 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 11:41:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from cypher.net (black@zen.pratt.edu [205.232.115.155]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA14827 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 11:41:28 -0800 (PST) Received: (from black@localhost) by cypher.net (8.8.5/8.7.1) id OAA13172; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:41:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:41:13 -0500 (EST) From: Ben Black To: "Paul T. Root" cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI-II vs Ultra-SCSI In-Reply-To: <199703261903.NAA00295@horton.iaces.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Ultra SCSI uses the same 68pin connector as wide SCSI, so you need either an ultra or wide SCSI controller to use ultra drives. b3n On Wed, 26 Mar 1997, Paul T. Root wrote: > > Hi all, > In my continuing saga of upgrading my home machine, I have a question > on SCSI. My machine is still using a 1542B (Adaptec ISA, SCSI-II), and I > need more disk. Can I put an Ultra Disk on it? > > Yes I know, that if it works it will not get optimum preformance, > that's fine for now. I found a 3.2 Gig Quantum for $399 from PC-Zone > which I could justify over a ~4.0 Gig EIDE drive for around $360. > > Paul. > > -- > #include > for(beer=100;beer>1;beer++){ > take_one_down(); > pass_it_around(); > } > back_to_work(); /*never reached */ >