From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 15 15:16:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA22920 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 15:16:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from scanner.worldgate.com (scanner.worldgate.com [198.161.84.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA22887 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 15:16:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcs@znep.com) Received: from znep.com (uucp@localhost) by scanner.worldgate.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with UUCP id QAA11271; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 16:16:03 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost) by alive.znep.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA15297; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 16:14:02 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 16:14:01 -0700 (MST) From: Marc Slemko To: Luigi Rizzo cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: delayed ACKs (fwd) In-Reply-To: <199801130434.FAA14829@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > I found this on the tcp-impl list... can someone comment if the feature > is still there in -current (or it ever was) ? Yes, as far as I know it is, however I don't have a box to try it on. This was the subject of the short "why 100 byte TCP segments?" thread on hackers on Sta. or so starting with FreeBSD isn't alone in this by any means and you don't run into it that often, but when you do it is a real pain.