Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:10:24 -0500 From: Frank Laszlo <laszlof@vonostingroup.com> To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade and gnome Message-ID: <440F3A30.9010206@vonostingroup.com> In-Reply-To: <65F8D6A1C5A07B2BF1E173BA@[10.110.3.244]> References: <65F8D6A1C5A07B2BF1E173BA@[10.110.3.244]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul Schmehl wrote: > Is there any way that portupgrade could be made "smart" enough to not > upgrade the gnome ports? Since you have to download and run the > upgrade script (and why isn't that part of the ports anyway?), it > doesn't make a great deal of sense to run portupgrade and then run the > gnome upgrade script, yet it's impossible to tell from portupgrade > (when it's running) what are gnome dependencies and what are not. > > Seems like a lot of duplication of effort could be easily fixed by > either downloading and calling the script (and exiting portupgrade?) > or simply ignoring any "gnome" ports. > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > University of Texas at Dallas > AVIEN Founding Member > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ Isnt this what pkgtools.conf is for? __________________________________________________ Frank Laszlo System Administrator The VonOstin Group Email: laszlof@tvog.net WWW: http://www.vonostingroup.com Mobile: 248-863-7584
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?440F3A30.9010206>