From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 15:50:15 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 396BA4DD;
 Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:50:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4EED366;
 Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:50:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org
 (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71B9A1FE022;
 Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:50:12 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <54B7E1E4.6040906@selasky.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:51:00 +0100
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC] kern/kern_timeout.c rewrite in progress
References: <54A4A002.8010802@selasky.org> <54A53F4F.2000003@selasky.org>
 <54A92ED1.2070906@selasky.org>
 <CAJ-Vmo=tc-hqykhyc5bQW8qd_34PZU6yfGY8wziByA0xnR3ANQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <54A9A71E.70609@selasky.org>
 <CAAAm0r39Sv3TCvwaCiNQ1Y9iBVtY_nb0A_iNOC41bgxqXmt+4w@mail.gmail.com>
 <54B29A49.3080600@selasky.org>
 <CAAAm0r2eNYicq+KKj5f5EE+KLPxdvy15wj1ZWS=zA6sgOtcoGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <54B67DA7.3070106@selasky.org> <54B7DECF.8070209@selasky.org>
 <20150115154617.GB10325@zxy.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20150115154617.GB10325@zxy.spb.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, sbruno@freebsd.org,
 Jason Wolfe <nitroboost@gmail.com>,
 "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:50:15 -0000

On 01/15/15 16:46, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:37:51PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
> Only stability impovement?
> Or performance too?

Hi,

Stability improvement mostly. Should not affect performance from what I 
know. Some changes are made about when and how we can select a different 
callback CPU for a callout callback. Try reading the updated timeout(9) 
man manual page first. Maybe it answers your question. Else feel free to 
ask here.

--HPS