From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 2 11:17: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from meow.osd.bsdi.com (meow.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED8A37B4EC for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:16:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@jhb-laptop.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.241]) by meow.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f12JGA389440; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:16:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20010202122754.F328@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 11:16:15 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: Suboptimal mmap of devices on i86 Cc: Matt Dillon Cc: Matt Dillon , Drew Eckhardt , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Doug White Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 02-Feb-01 Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:19:24PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> On 01-Feb-01 Doug White wrote: >> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, John Baldwin wrote: >> > >> >> Then only rename it in 4.x We can do an API change for 5.0. We'll be >> >> renaming syscall2() back to syscall() in 5.0 for example. We don't >> >> want to end up with syscall47() someday in FreeBSD 67.2. :-P >> > >> > And what happens to apps using the previous syscall(2) interface? They >> > die horribly? That's not acceptable. >> >> Huh? syscall2() is an internal kernel function. The only thing that might >> call it is a kernel module, and we won't support 4.x KLD's on 5.0. Period. >> It was renamed to syscall2() to cause old KLD's to fail to load with a >> symbol >> lookup problem back when teh MPSAFE flag was first added to x86 syscalls. >> The >> only thing that changing it back to syscall() in -current does is cause any >> 6 >> month old 5.0-current KLD's that happen to call syscall() to call it wrong. > > Uhm.. I believe he meant syscall(2) as in 'the "syscall" entity described > in section 2 of the manual', which in this case happens to be: > > NAME > syscall, __syscall - indirect system call > > ..as used in src/lib/libc/sys/*.c. I'm not renaming that function. I'm renaming syscall2() in sys/i386/i386/trap.c, which is an internal function only used by the kernel for the kernel side of syscall entry. -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message