Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 17:47:03 +0700 (NOVST) From: Max Khon <fjoe@newst.net> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssl/mdX.h and mdX.h name clashes Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104021745180.91253-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20010402130807.L462@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > /usr/include/mdX.h and /usr/include/openssl/mdX.h > > both declare structures and functions with the same name > > (structures are a bit different) and this is a bit troublesome for > > applications that want to link with both -lmd and -lcrypto > > > > can we consider merging our mdX.h enhancements (MD5End, MD5File) to > > openssl and switching to openssl/mdX.h entirely? > > I believe that this is the way things are supposed to happen; this > has been discussed on -arch recently, although somebody stated that > OpenSSL already has all the functionality. I wasn't quite able to > find analogous functions in the source; and a single function, > without setting up a BIO object and stuff, when all you need is > the MD5 hash of a file by name, is definitely something useful. Thanks for the pointer. I'll go read archives. I have already noticed that function names are different (underscores) but the problem remains for compilation time. /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0104021745180.91253-100000>