Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:39:30 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>, ports@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New rules for naming patches Message-ID: <3975CBB2.CE38F8EB@FreeBSD.org> References: <3975AFE6.EBB9FB9@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSI.4.21.0007190959220.3080-100000@blues.jpj.net> <20000719171403.A13769@cichlids.cichlids.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake Trevor Johnson (trevor@jpj.net): > > > should help make the history more comprehensible: the patches to a > > particular source file will automatically go in the same ,v file as > > patches are created and removed over the lifetime of a port. > > Only if you do something like > patch-subdir1_subdir2_subdir3_file.name > for each file, which is kinda overhead :) It may be even worse: patch-subdir1_subdir2_subdir3_file.name__foo__bar.c if the original file is name_foo_bar.c >:-| -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3975CBB2.CE38F8EB>