From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jun 26 18:01:39 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA24272
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 18:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.8.15.25])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA24237;
          Thu, 26 Jun 1997 18:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from danny@localhost)
	by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA22485;
	Fri, 27 Jun 1997 11:00:35 +1000 (EST)
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 11:00:34 +1000 (EST)
From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>
To: Bernie Doehner <bad@uhf.wireless.net>
cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, isp@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ipfw: setsockopt failed
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970626200931.701B-100000@uhf.wdc.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970627105934.869s-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Thu, 26 Jun 1997, Bernie Doehner wrote:

> > 
> > ipfw add divert 32000 ip from any to any via ed1     for example
> > 
> > the system send me the message
> > 
> > 00000 divert 32000 ip from any to any via ed1
> > ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument 
> 
> via is a legal keyword?

Yes.  Man ipfw.  You can say

'ipfw ... in via ed0'
'ipfw ... out via ed0'
'ipfw ... via ed0'  (in or out)