From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun  9 18:40:43 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FDB16A41B;
	Fri,  9 Jun 2006 18:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78A943D70;
	Fri,  9 Jun 2006 18:40:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2])
	by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id A0083B833;
	Fri,  9 Jun 2006 21:40:41 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 1660 invoked by uid 1002);
	Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:40:41 -0000
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:40:41 +0300
From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
To: =?cp-1251?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu>
Message-ID: <20060609184041.GA1615@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
References: <448937F5.4070607@t-hosting.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <448937F5.4070607@t-hosting.hu>
X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, emulators@FreeBSD.org,
	Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: The future of Gentoo ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: vd@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:40:43 -0000


--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:57:25AM +0200, Kvesdn Gbor wrote:
[...]
> This introduces a new group of ports (linux_dist*) that are complete=20
> linux environment for cross-development, etc. At the same time a=20
> WITH_LINUXBASE macro should be added for installing them into=20
> ${LINUXBASE} and this requires a conditional CONFLICTS with another=20
> linux_base ports.

I think it would be great if one can have more than one linux_base port
installed at the same time. Something like
/usr/compat/linux_debian
/usr/compat/linux_suse
/usr/compat/linux_fc
/usr/compat/linux_gentoo
/usr/compat/linux_rh
and /usr/compat/linux being a symlink to the "default" one.

Does anyone think that this would be useful?

--=20
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv

Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
                -- Edsger W. Dijkstra

--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFEicCpFw6SP/bBpCARAkTaAKCqhxy+OEC3bTO1jGmLwYETS2u8eQCfX3jY
V1fl85Au6YsexMFya7Si0Ik=
=Xtdk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--