From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 5 15:50:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8C316A402; Sat, 5 May 2007 15:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from outfbmx006.isp.belgacom.be (outfbmx006.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.5.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C73213C457; Sat, 5 May 2007 15:50:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (outmx008.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.5.235]) by outfbmx006.isp.belgacom.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676C438DEC; Sat, 5 May 2007 17:29:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id l45FTfVM023178; Sat, 5 May 2007 17:29:41 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (117.119-247-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [81.247.119.117]) by outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id l45FTdTc023170; Sat, 5 May 2007 17:29:39 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.kotnet.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l45FTX4I002804; Sat, 5 May 2007 17:29:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 17:29:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070503181646.GA1527@roadrunner.q.local> <200705041438.42358.tijl@ulyssis.org> <20070504191523.GA2925@roadrunner.q.local> In-Reply-To: <20070504191523.GA2925@roadrunner.q.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705051729.32132.tijl@ulyssis.org> Cc: scottl@freebsd.org, Ulrich Spoerlein Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Region Code DVDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 15:50:38 -0000 On Friday 04 May 2007 21:15:23 Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > On Thursday 03 May 2007 20:16:46 Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > > > I can not even read a single sector from such a DVD with the > > > external drive, but it's working just fine with the internal one. > > > It's really driving me nuts. > > > > Maybe you have to change the drive region code (RPC 2). I had to do > > this a couple years ago with a laptop's internal drive. Either that or > > you need to find a patched firmware to make the drive region free > > (RPC 1). > > Sadly, your programs don't work. Neither for the interal drive, nor for > the external one. No matter which media I have inserted: > > May 4 21:09:43 roadrunner kernel: (cd0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Vendor Specific Command. CDB: a4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 > May 4 21:09:43 roadrunner kernel: (cd0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > May 4 21:09:43 roadrunner kernel: (cd0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition > May 4 21:09:43 roadrunner kernel: (cd0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 > May 4 21:09:43 roadrunner kernel: (cd0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Invalid field in CDB > May 4 21:09:43 roadrunner kernel: (cd0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Unretryable error > > > May 4 21:10:22 roadrunner kernel: acd0: FAILURE - REPORT_KEY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 > May 4 21:10:22 roadrunner kernel: (cd1:ata1:0:0:0): Vendor Specific Command. CDB: a4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 > May 4 21:10:22 roadrunner kernel: (cd1:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > May 4 21:10:22 roadrunner kernel: (cd1:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition > May 4 21:10:22 roadrunner kernel: (cd1:ata1:0:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 > May 4 21:10:22 roadrunner kernel: (cd1:ata1:0:0:0): Invalid field in CDB > May 4 21:10:22 roadrunner kernel: (cd1:ata1:0:0:0): Unretryable error I can't tell you what's wrong here. The CDB looks correct to me. Maybe there have to be more negotiations before the rpc info can be requested?