Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Jun 2014 17:25:04 +0200
From:      Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Drewery, Bryan" <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Ryan Steinmetz <zi@FreeBSD.org>, "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, "novel@FreeBSD.org" <novel@FreeBSD.org>, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r356398 - head/security/vuxml
Message-ID:  <20140604172504.23a766e4@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <538F3512.8040509@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201406031942.s53JgeGI046605@svn.freebsd.org> <20140604103240.6826697f@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <51539FB3-D510-479C-A076-87068BD01022@FreeBSD.org> <20140604142438.GA57245@exodus.zi0r.com> <538F3512.8040509@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:02:42 -0500 Drewery, Bryan wrote:
> On 6/4/14, 9:24 AM, Ryan Steinmetz wrote:
>> On (06/04/14 08:50), Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>>> On Jun 4, 2014, at 3:32, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 19:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Ryan Steinmetz wrote:
>>>>> Author: zi
>>>>> Date: Tue Jun  3 19:42:40 2014
>>>>> New Revision: 356398
>>>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/356398
>>>>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r356398/
>>>>>
>>>>> Log:
>>>>>  - Document vulnerability in security/gnutls3 (CVE-2014-3466)
>>>>
>>>> Is security/gnutls affected by this as well?  Because most ports are
>>>> still using that version.
>>>
>>> Not sure. That port needs to just die though and all ports use the new.
>>
>> GnuTLS' website doesn't mention 2.x, however, I did see someones post
>> that mentioned that the bad code may have been introduced in 1.x.

There's a commit in the 2.12 branch for this so it is affected:
https://www.gitorious.org/gnutls/gnutls/commits/89238044ade02c4d80e334ab74056ef28599663d

>> Given that 2.x seems deprecated/unsupported by the authors, I think we
>> really need to push to ditch it.
> 
> It's already planned to do so. Just needs to have the work done.

I could spend some time on this.  Has there been any work done already?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140604172504.23a766e4>