Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 20:48:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AUTO_EOI_* ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970807204645.187A-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <19970807194336.27057@hydrogen.nike.efn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Tom Samplonius scribbled this message on Aug 7: > > > > It seems that the AUTO_EOI_* options might speed interupt handling. > > I've tried them on some motherboards, and they seem to work ok. Are these > > options recommended? I've seen some talk that these options should be > > eliminated? > > well... don't make AUTO_EOI_2 enabled by default... I have a motherboard > that dies when this option is enabled... though I haven't found one yet > when AUTO_EOI_1 is enabled... the comments say that AUTO_EOI_1 will > break suspend/resume on some notebooks... so it looks like we can't > enable both by default... Every motherboard I've tried it on works fine, even an old EISA 486 motherboard, but all the boards I tested were made by ASUS... > -- > John-Mark Gurney Modem/FAX: +1 541 683 6954 > Cu Networking > > Live in Peace, destroy Micro$oft, support free software, run FreeBSD > > Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970807204645.187A-100000>