From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jul 14 11:27:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from shell.webmaster.com (mail.webmaster.com [209.133.28.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F94815489 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:27:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davids@webmaster.com) Received: from whenever ([209.133.29.2]) by shell.webmaster.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35) with SMTP id com; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:26:54 -0700 From: "David Schwartz" To: "Phil Regnauld" Cc: Subject: RE: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ? Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:26:54 -0700 Message-ID: <000001bece26$72d03780$021d85d1@youwant.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 In-Reply-To: <19990714203806.46887@ns.int.ftf.net> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > David Schwartz writes: > > > threads. Log-based system. There's nothing I know of in any UNIX > > > > That should read "log-based file system". I'm talking about > NTFS. And it > > beats an fsck any day. > > Doesn't beat other LFSes. And what is it good at ? > Integrity ? Fragmentation (hah!) > Performance ? Agreed. The question was not "what does NT do better than every UNIX". It was "what does NT do better than any UNIX". One other nice thing about NTFS (although certainly not unique) is that you can defragement it while it's operating. DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message