Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 22:06:03 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251117] [NEW PORT] www/palemoon: Open-source web browser Message-ID: <bug-251117-7788-kGsAw9iBkq@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251117-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251117-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251117 --- Comment #115 from Matt A. Tobin <email@mattatobin.com> --- Pale Moon's classification at least when I was there of an unofficial build= is basically just an expression of willingness to put a logo on it and if you should expect it to work and if you should blame us if it doesn't. Limited granted but simple to follow. Heh.. as if. You guys could likely turn unofficial into official if you expressed intere= st. Since I ain't there don't let that stop you guys if that is really what you want and they could use it right now. Reviving WhiteStar is pointless because for reasons I am not privy or particularly interested in the worst prospect for survival of a no-name pro= ject by fanatics is not gonna be on Apple Hardware but since that is what they h= ave chosen to do and dbsoft is back in charge of it and seemingly doing a job P= ale Moon users are happy with it kinda makes Whitestar redundant since it was o= nly created because of past issues in collaboration. As I vaguely care to understand he is keeping whitestar around for testing and experimentation b= ut not really as a mainline project except knowing him I am sure he would fall back if they fell out again. I hope these insights help. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251117-7788-kGsAw9iBkq>