From owner-freebsd-git@freebsd.org Fri Apr 2 10:02:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-git@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD715CA590 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 10:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.vx.sk (mail.vx.sk [144.76.20.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBbFP6pl9z4f4c for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 10:02:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.vx.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vx.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FB01E738D for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:02:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.vx.sk Received: from mail.vx.sk by mail.vx.sk (amavisd-new, unix socket) with LMTP id kCrcvoHUu1NZ for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:02:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.9.8.122] (188-167-101-78.dynamic.chello.sk [188.167.101.78]) by mail.vx.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9944A1E7411 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:02:05 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-git@FreeBSD.org From: Martin Matuska Subject: OpenZFS branch tracking policy Message-ID: <21c7313e-315c-ec48-9437-e0a3d4ec14d2@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:02:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FBbFP6pl9z4f4c X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:144.76.0.0/16, country:DE]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-git@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of git use in the FreeBSD project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 10:02:18 -0000 Dear git working group, OpenZFS 2.1 is approaching and there is an ongoing discussion between=20 the ZFS developers regarding branch tracking. What we want archieve: FreeBSD main will be tracking the master branch of openzfs/zfs FreeBSD stable/13 will be tracking the zfs-2.1-release and upcoming=20 staging branches of openzfs/zfs (they always have continuous commits) At the moment, I rsync changes from openzfs/zfs to our vendor/openfzfs=20 and commit them. The question is, if this is the correct way to do this? OpenZFS uses git so we might skip vendor/openzfs and subtree merge=20 directly from openzfs/master (and that way inherit all OpenZFS history)=20 and openzfs/zfs-2.1-release. That would be way easier to manage and we=20 can track and see "real" commits from OpenZFS. The other way would be like now, keep two vendor branches and rsync, but = that makes it harder to track. I would be really happy for a decision so I can start merging=20 zfs-2.1-release. Best regards, mm