From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 7 18:07:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EB7106568F for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 18:07:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spambox@haruhiism.net) Received: from mail.haruhiism.net (remilia.fujibayashi.jp [92.243.64.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4488FC1B for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 18:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (datacenter.telecombusinessconsulting.net [77.221.137.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.haruhiism.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0570344E14; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 03:07:19 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <4ACCD8DC.1030403@haruhiism.net> Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:07:24 +0400 From: Kamigishi Rei User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Kurtsou References: <4ACBD4CA.3070300@haruhiism.net> <20091007173655.GA11144@tops> In-Reply-To: <20091007173655.GA11144@tops> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Current Subject: Re: ZFS-related panic, 8.0-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:07:23 -0000 On 07.10.2009 21:36, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > panic: _sx_xlock_hard: recursed on non-recursive sx >> zfsvfs->z_hold_mtx[i] @ >> /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_znode.c:1023 >> > Do you run nullfs on top of zfs by any chance? > Indeed. I'm using ezjail suite, and it uses nullfs to link jail subdirectories to the base structure. > I've seen something similar. It was caused by > zfs -> getnewvnode -> zfs_inactive > But information provided is not enough for debugging. Can you get full > backtrace? > I've disabled gmirror so next time I'll probably get the backtrace. Note that with 8.0-BETA3, the previous revision I ran, nothing happened through 39+ days uptime with the same ezjail-based structure. -- Kamigishi Rei KREI-RIPE