From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 30 22:41:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA16229 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 22:41:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from word.smith.net.au (word.smith.net.au [202.0.75.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA16218; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 22:41:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.smith.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00529; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 17:07:23 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199710310637.RAA00529@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Steve Milliner cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: modem transmision problems?? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 31 Oct 1997 12:47:47 +1000." <199710310247.MAA11633@russell.icis.qut.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 17:07:22 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > RECAP: modem overflow problem > > /kernel: sio3: 78 more tty-level buffer overflows > > occurs: during mail delivery. > > tried: decreasing build up of mail on queue to stop flooding modem > > > > Are you using user-mode ppp? If so, it sounds like the machine is > > heavily loaded and the ppp process is being starved of CPU for extended > > periods of time. > > > > Yep using user ppp. Ok. > AS for load - not really (98% idle) - not heavy enough to cause > starvation in any case - which kind of suggests its a sending > rather than receiving problem I guess?? No. Read the manpage entry I posted *again*. It refers to data *arriving* and not being dealt with. > Does anyone know if there are problems with how hang-ups > on the client side are handled by FBSD - ie. the mail starts to get pushed > on to the device, part way through the connection goes down, but data > is still pushed on to the modem which now (obviously) > can't get rid of it ?? but I find it hard to believe that this case would > not be handeled (ie. sync sending of data to modem) ???? I don't understand what you are saying; do you mean that these messages are only ever seen when the line drops? mike