From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Apr 8 20:48:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C835D37B423 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 20:48:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f393mmm06531; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 20:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 20:48:48 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Tim Zingelman Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make release broken with too many ports/distfiles... Message-ID: <20010408204848.L15938@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010408202300.J15938@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from zingelman@fnal.gov on Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 10:38:37PM -0500 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Tim Zingelman [010408 20:39] wrote: > On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > $FreeBSD: src/release/Makefile,v 1.536.2.40 2000/03/27 16:49:58 > > > Please provide more context, which makefile is this patch to be > > applied against? > > See above... it is /usr/src/release/Makefile from 4.3-RC. > > > What if ports/distfiles is a symlink? Or is this only done during > > make release? > > Yes, only during 'make release'. If I am reading things correctly, this > is in a 'chroot ${CHROOTDIR}' environment. You'll want to fling this at Jordan , he's the release engineer. :) -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message